A Budget Without Memory

A Budget Without Memory

Why India Needs an Outcome Ledger Before Another Outlay

Ravishankar Kalyanasundaram

 “Unless outcomes precede outlays, every budget will read like a fresh manifesto. India needs not just a statement of accounts — but a statement of accountability.”

If this simple idea becomes practice, it could transform the way governments connect with citizens — turning budgets from grand declarations into grounded conversations.

India today has no shortage of bold schemes, visionary missions, or impressive budgetary commitments. From Smart Cities to Sagarmala, Mega Food Parks to Defence Corridors, the country has rolled out more transformative programmes in a decade than many others attempt in a generation.

But behind these ambitions lies a quiet public question:

Did these projects actually deliver the outcomes they promised?

And if they didn’t — who told us, and what did we do next?

The Missing Chapter

The Union Budget, as it stands today, is a finely crafted presentation. The Economic Survey is detailed and data-rich. Ministries roll out targets and timelines. Parliament debates, and television scrolls buzz with headlines.

Yet for the average citizen — the student, the street vendor, the small farmer, the senior pensioner — it often feels like a distant exercise. There is no chapter in this national ritual that answers plainly:

  • What did last year’s ₹100,000 crore on health or education deliver?
  • Did Smart Cities make cities smarter — or just more cemented?
  • How many food parks became real engines for farmers — and not just parked capital?

We know how much was allocated. But we don’t always know what changed.

High-Profile Schemes, Low Street Impact

Consider the Mega Food Park Scheme. It promised linkages for 25,000 farmers per park, thousands of jobs, and reduced wastage. Yet over a decade later, only about half the sanctioned parks are fully operational — with uneven impact, limited outreach, and negligible transformation in farmgate incomes. The parks exist, but their presence is rarely felt by the people they were meant to empower.

Or take the Smart Cities Mission. The name was aspirational. Yet many cities ended up with fragmented upgrades — a bus shelter here, a digital dashboard there — while holistic urban transformation remains incomplete. For many, the “smartness” is still waiting to be experienced.

These examples are not just failures — they reflect a deeper cultural gap in governance: the mistaken belief that a scheme’s life cycle ends with its announcement.

The Gap in Institutional Practice

Yes, India does have Economic Surveys and Outcome Budgets. But they are fragmented, overly technical, and disconnected from citizen experience. Dashboards exist, but in silos. Evaluations, where conducted, are often post-mortem — rarely feeding into budget corrections. And parliamentary debates seldom lead to formal performance-linked restructuring.

This creates a system where budgets are remembered by their headlines, not their impact. Public optimism is replaced by quiet resignation — and future schemes are received with scepticism, even if they are well-intended.

A Budget Prequel: What India Needs

This is why India needs a Budget Prequel: a National Outcome Review presented before the Union Budget.

This is not merely a reform in accounting — it is a democratic commitment. A public declaration of:

  • Where the money went
  • What was achieved
  • What underperformed — and why
  • What will be recalibrated

This “Chapter Zero” would reconnect budgets with memory — with delivery — and most importantly, with the people.

Discipline Across Institutions

To embed this outcome-led discipline, the government must activate a network of institutions:

Institution Contribution
NITI Aayog Align schemes with national goals and SDGs
RBI Assess macroeconomic and credit implications
FCI Track impact of food subsidy and logistics
Line Ministries Publish outcome scorecards annually
CAG / External Auditors Independently validate performance claims

The Ministry of Finance can lead this coordination — but cannot be expected to carry it alone.

Four Actionable Reforms

  1. Chapter Zero: A pre-budget outcome ledger for every major scheme, tracking targets vs. results.
  2. Red Flag Protocol: Any scheme missing 40% of outcome targets in two years should trigger formal review or restructuring.
  3. Sunset Clauses: No project above ₹1000 crore should continue indefinitely without performance reassessment.
  4. Public Communication: Outcomes must be released widely — in dashboards, press briefings, and translated local formats.

Connecting with Citizens — Not Just Credit Ratings

This is not an anti-government proposal. It is pro-governance. It shifts attention from announcements to results, from optics to operations, from budgeting for applause to budgeting for trust.

Governments rightly seek the confidence of rating agencies and investors. But they must also win — and keep — the confidence of citizens.

A budget will resonate not because it has catchy headlines, but because people can see the road that was built, the hospital that was upgraded, the job that was generated. The budget must move from media moment to memory marker.

Final Word

India does not need another manifesto disguised as a budget.

It needs a memory — backed by outcomes, measured with rigour, and communicated with humility.

And that memory must begin with a visible, verified, and citizen-facing outcome review before the next rupee is allocated.

Only then will the budget become not just a financial plan — but a public covenant.

 

Share: thumb thumb thumb thumb

Leave your comments here...

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles